VibeHub vs Entire: AI agent sessions kept with your code

Entire describes itself as a distributed git forge that stores your intent alongside your code. Its CLI, entire enable, installs hooks for your agents and git hooks for the repo. Agent hooks collect prompts, the transcript, tool activity, changed files, and token usage; the git hooks link that context to each commit with an Entire-Checkpoint trailer.

Checkpoints are stored in git under refs/entire/checkpoints/ and pushed to your remote by default, or to a separate private repo if you prefer. On top of the CLI, entire.com adds code hosting, agentic search across code, commits, and sessions, and Trails, a review flow meant to replace the pull request. The company raised a $60M seed round in February 2026, per TechCrunch.

VibeHub treats each AI-built change as a vibe: the prompts, agent transcript, and model config bundled with the git commit. The Claude Code plugin streams prompts, tool calls, and assistant turns into a VibeHub session as you work, and vb commit or the /vibehub:capture skill attaches that session to the commit.

The other difference is sharing. A vibe can be published as a public page that shows the prompts and tool behind a build, and others can fork it into their own account with lineage back to the source. Code stays on GitHub through vb push, which mirrors plain-git commits to a linked repo.

With Entire, transcripts travel with your git remote, so anyone who can read the repo can read the sessions; its README says secret redaction is best effort. With VibeHub, transcripts are uploaded to VibeHub, encrypted at rest, and returned only to you unless you publish the vibe. Both approaches mean a prompt that contains a secret ends up stored somewhere, so keep secrets out of prompts either way.