Compare

VibeHub vs MemoV (VibeGit): hosted vs local AI history

MemoV and VibeHub solve the same problem — keeping the prompts and context behind AI-written code — in different places. MemoV is an open-source (MIT) MCP server that keeps a private, local shadow timeline in .mem without touching .git; VibeHub wraps real git commits, stores the vibe on VibeHub, and mirrors to GitHub for sharing and collaboration. Pick MemoV for a private, local, free history; pick VibeHub to share, fork, and review vibes with others.

Last reviewed 2026-10-31

FeatureVibeHubMemoV
LicenseHosted service; CLI free to useOpen source, MIT
How it capturesvb commit, git hooks, editor plugins, MCPMCP server tools the agent calls (snap)
Where history livesIn your git commits + VibeHubLocal shadow .mem timeline
Touches your git historyYes — every vibe is a real git commitNo — "zero pollution on .git"
Prompts & transcriptYes — full transcript, tool calls includedYes — prompt, response, plan, changed files
Roll backvb checkout <sha>mem_jump restores files onto a new branch
ViewerWeb dashboard, shareable vibe pagesLocal web UI (mem_ui)
Sharing, forks, GitHub mirrorYesNot its focus — local-first
CostFree tier; credits for premium actionsFree

What MemoV does

MemoV describes itself as a memory layer for AI coding agents — "Git-powered version control for prompts, context, and code diffs." It runs as an MCP server; the agent calls snap to record the prompt, response, plan, and changed files, mem_history to list them, and mem_jump to restore a snapshot (on a new branch, so nothing is lost).

History lives in a separate shadow .mem timeline, so your .git stays clean. It is private-first — local, no database — and lists support for Claude Code, Codex, VS Code, Cursor, and Antigravity. A mem_ui command opens a local web viewer with a timeline and diffs.

What VibeHub does differently

VibeHub puts the context in your real history: every vibe wraps a git commit, bundling the spec, prompts, transcript, model config, diff, eval, and artifact. vb push sends the code to origin and mirrors it to GitHub, and the vibe is viewable on VibeHub.

That makes VibeHub social: public vibes, a gallery, forks with tracked lineage, collections, and evals scored against a vibe. The trade-off is that captured transcripts are uploaded to VibeHub (encrypted at rest, returned only to you for private vibes) rather than staying on your machine.

Which to pick

If you are a solo developer who wants an undo history for agent sessions that never leaves your laptop, MemoV is a strong, free fit — and it is open source, so you can audit or extend it.

If you want other people — reviewers, teammates, or the public — to see, fork, and build on the prompts behind your code, and you want that context attached to the same commits that land on GitHub, VibeHub is built for that.

Choose MemoV if…

  • You want history that stays entirely on your machine with no account or upload.
  • You want an open-source (MIT) tool you can inspect, fork, or self-modify.
  • You want to keep AI snapshots out of your git history entirely.

Choose VibeHub if…

  • You want the prompts and transcript attached to the real git commits your team reviews.
  • You want to share, fork, and publish vibes, and mirror code to GitHub on push.
  • You want evals and model config stored alongside each change.

Questions, answered.

Is MemoV the same as VibeGit?
Yes — the MemoV repository refers to its workflow as VibeGit.
Does MemoV modify my .git directory?
According to its README, no: it keeps a separate shadow .mem timeline with "zero pollution on .git". VibeHub, by contrast, wraps a real git commit for every vibe.
Can I use both?
They work at different layers — MemoV as a local MCP snapshot tool, VibeHub at commit time — but we have not tested them together, so try it on a scratch repo first.

More comparisons

Version the whole vibe.

The vb CLI, public vibes, and GitHub mirroring are free forever.